Showing posts with label Art Spiegelman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Art Spiegelman. Show all posts

29 July 2021

Little Orphan Annie by Harold Gray (No. 62)

Little Orphan Annie (1924-1968)
by Harold Gray 

REVIEW BY DAVID LASKY:
(from The 100 Best Comics of the Century! in The Comics Journal #210, 1999)
[This review has been removed at the request of the author.]

REVIEW BY ART SPIEGELMAN:
Check out The Complete Little Orphan Annie by Harold Gray. The blank-eyed orphan was far grittier and moving than the saccharine Annie you know from the damn musical. [It] started in 1924 in a world chillingly like ours: crawling with cake-eaters, greedy bankers and international con men who exploit the hardscrabble working stiffs Annie hangs with when her “Daddy” isn’t around to protect her. The cartoonist, a tightlipped Midwestern Dickens, pushes the virtues of honesty, pluck, and hard work in adventures that can melt the heart of even hard-boiled cynics like I pretend to be.


REVIEW BY CHESTER BROWN:
I remember talking about how much I’d been influenced by Harold Gray, the cartoonist who wrote and drew Little Orphan Annie. That influence has certainly continued, along with being influenced by other cartoonists of the early-to-mid-20th century. In those days, cartoonists tended to draw full characters in the frame and not rely so much on close-ups. Very early on, close-ups were unheard of. At the time of George Herriman, you just didn’t do close-ups. Even Harold Gray, he might do a shot from the waist up, but never a full face in a panel, y’know. For whatever reason, that’s what I respond to. It seems kind of emotionally excessive to really zoom in on a face or a pair of eyes, or things like that. And it probably has a lot to do with my psychological makeup, but I don’t examine that too closely. It’s just a matter of, “Yeah, this is what I respond to, so I want to create similar sorts of work."


FURTHER READING:



24 July 2021

Jack Cole & Plastic Man: An Appreciation by Art Spiegelman

Jack Cole & Plastic Man:
An Appreciation by Art Spiegelman
(The New Yorker, 19 April 1999)

Disguised as a red, black, and yellow throw rug, our hero cocks one ear up to listen in on two hoods huddled at the table that rests on him. In the next panel he literally hangs out at an art museum, above a label that says “Abstract,” his body now distorted into a red, black, and yellow bebop-Cubist composition, in order to eavesdrop on two cheap gunsels out gallery-hopping. And in the panel after that two molls gossip from tenement windows across an alley while our protean hero continues his stakeout camouflaged as a red, black, and yellow line of laundry flapping between them.

This manic spritz of images appeared in a 1950 issue of Plastic Man, one of the last issues written and drawn by Jack Cole, a tragically short-lived comic-book giant. Plastic Man can be found mainly in those plastic bags collectors use to stash their rare, slow-burning forest fires of newsprint, although DC Comics has at last published The Plastic Man Archives, Volume 1, which at least reprints the first twenty Plastic Man stories, published between 1941 and 1943, when the developing artist was just beginning to stretch. (Incidentally, the reproduction in this de-luxe, $49.95 hardcover stinks - or maybe it simply doesn’t stink enough, managing somehow to look both blurry and shrill. Anyone with a spare twenty-six thousand four hundred and fifty dollars should consider seeking out near-mint copies of the original pulp-paper comic books.) I’m embarrassed to confess to being in love with a superhero comic, but Jack Cole’s Plastic Man belongs high on any adult’s How to Avoid Prozac list, up there with the best of S. J. Perelman, Laurel and Hardy, Damon Runyon, Tex Avery, and the Marx Brothers. Cole’s comics have helped me feel reconciled to the misleading word “comic,” which often keeps my medium of choice from getting any respect.

Many otherwise literate people, even those who have long since crossed the high-low divide and welcomed comic strips like Krazy Kat and Little Nemo into the canon of twentieth-century cultural achievement - right up there next to Picasso’s paintings and Joyce’s novels - remain predisposed against comic books. Of course, most comic books really are junk, just as our parents said, but so is most painting and literature. The lowly comic book has a lot of strikes against it, not least a residual public distaste left over from Senator Kefauver’s nineteen-fifties crime hearings, which scapegoated the whole medium as a species of pornography for tots. The hearings forced a draconian “self-regulating” Comics Code Authority on the publishers; the edict stamped out the reckless excesses of the crime, war, and horror comics (categories that tended to appeal to an older audience of G.I.s and other adults) and left lobotomized superheroes and innocuous funny animals as virtually the only survivors on the newsstands. We’ve committed some of our most censorious follies in the guise of protecting our children.

It’s a tribute to the medium’s appeal that the comic book has bounced back from the grave several times in its history, though the industry has never been as close to death as now. Near-suicidal publishing and marketing decisions - for example, aiming at a narrow collectors’ market rather than reaching out to mainstream audiences - have left the industry in a depressed state. Television almost killed what remained of comics in the mid-fifties; now new computer-generated special-effects technologies have robbed comics of even their near-monopoly on primal visual fantasy. Comic books must reposition themselves - possibly as Art - in order to survive as anything more than part of the feeder system for Hollywood. Otherwise, like vaudeville, they will vanish.

Art? It now seems natural to see Orson Welles’s Touch of Evil or a Howard Hawks Western at MOMA, but a generation of aestheticians like Manny Farber had to show people how to see movies for such programming to become plausible. In a landmark 1962 essay in Film Culture, Farber looked at B movies with a painter’s eyes and championed the neglected genre films he loved. He contrasted “the idea of art as an expensive hunk of well-regulated area... shrieking with preciosity, fame, ambition” with art made “where the spotlight of culture is nowhere in evidence, so that the craftsman can be ornery, wasteful, stubbornly self-involved, doing go-for-broke art and not caring what comes of it.” This he called a “termite-tapeworm-fungus-moss art... that goes always forward, eating its own boundaries and likely as not leaves nothing in its path other than signs of eager, industrious unkempt activity.” The comic-book form has always swarmed with termites, never more so than in the Golden Age, which collectors date from the spring of 1938, when Superman first turned the ephemeral periodicals into a major fad, until the devastation brought by the Comics Code, in late 1954. It was a time when comics always travelled below critical radar and offered a direct gateway into the unrestrained dream life of their creators - lurid, violent, funny, and sometimes sublime.

Jack Cole, whose comic-book career started a year before that Golden Age and ended precisely with it, was born in December, 1914, in the small coal-mining and industrial town of New Castle, in western Pennsylvania. His father, a Methodist Sunday-school teacher for twenty years, owned a drygoods store and was a popular local performer, playing the bones in King Cole’s Corn Crackers; his mother had been a grade-school teacher. Jack, the third of six children, was introspective, imaginative, high-spirited, and graced with a pronounced sense of humor. A childhood passion for newspaper strips like Elzie Segar’s Thimble Theater (featuring Popeye), George McManus’s Bringing Up Father, and Rube Goldberg’s Boob McNutt blossomed into a lifelong desire to draw a syndicated strip of his own. His formal art training, beyond copying his favorites to crack their physiognomic code, consisted of mail-order lessons from the Landon School of Cartooning. When he was fifteen, he secretly saved up his school-lunch money to pay for the course, smuggling sandwiches from home in the hollowed-out pages of a book. Two years later, he again proved his strength of character by bicycling alone to Los Angeles and back, a seven-thousand-mile adventure that he later recounted in his first sale, an illustrated feature forBoy’s Life.

After graduating from high school, Cole eloped with his childhood sweetheart, Dorothy Mahoney. Drawing cartoons at night and working at the local American Can factory by day, he remained in his parents’ home until his mother found out about the secret marriage and suggested that he live with his wife. Dick Cole, his youngest brother, still remembers the Pop-Art-before-its-time furniture Jack playfully improvised out of printed tin sheets brought home from his job. American Can, however, clearly didn’t offer him the creative outlet he was searching for, and in 1936, at the age of twenty-two, he quit. Borrowing five hundred dollars from family friends and local merchants, he moved to Greenwich Village with Dorothy to seek his fortune as a cartoonist. In a dutiful letter that he sent home after settling in, he put a positive spin on his career prospects, praising Dorothy’s steadfastness and reassuring his parents that he hadn’t been corrupted by the big city:

"Every kid wants to grow up to be as good as his parents, and I, being no exception have about as high a goal as could be possible to strive for. Have tried to do things as you would do them, but unfortunately I am ruled by my heart rather than my head, and sometimes slip up. (or rather, many times) I have never told you this before, but in case you are interested, I have never taken a drink of beer or liquer yet and never mean to—don’t smoke—cuss some but have never used HIS name in a vain expression."

Though he eventually smoked, drank moderately, and possibly even took God’s name in vain, Cole was always conscientious. In time, he paid his debts to the New Castle folk who sponsored him, although in his first year of trying to break into magazines and newspapers he had whittled his stake down to five cents. According to the comics historian Ron Goulart - whose brief but invaluable Focus on Jack Cole (Fantagraphics; 1986) is the closest the cartoonist has come to having a biography - Cole found himself working for about twenty dollars a week in a factory again: in Harry “A” Chesler’s comic-book “sweatshop,” at Fifth Avenue and Twenty-ninth Street, set up to provide new material for publishers unable to find any newspaper strips worth reprinting. The first ten-cent comic book, Famous Funnies, published in 1934, consisted of reduced-scale color reprints of Mutt and Jeff, The Bungle Family, and other popular syndicated features; green-kid cartoonists worked elbow to elbow with old pulp illustrators, down-on-their-luck painters, and other has-beens and never-wases to pioneer a new art form at cut rates that could compete with the low-priced syndicate retreads. Marshall McLuhan has written that every new medium cannibalizes the content of the medium that preceded it (the movies, for example, were once called “photoplays”), and the comic book bears this idea out: pale imitations of Dick Tracy and Mandrake the Magician were the anemic norm until 1938, when the first issue of Action Comics presented a caped Übermensch who fought for Truth, Justice, and the American Way - a crack-brained idea by two Jewish kids from Cleveland that really made the new medium fly. Action! The title nails the basic appeal of the new four-color heroes: Crimson Avengers, Purple Zombies, Green Masks, Blue Beetles, Blue Bolts, Blue Streaks, White Streaks, and Silver Streaks started zipping through the sky, hitting the newsstands and one another.

Cole thrived, first in the Chesler shop and then as a freelancer, working against tight deadlines and learning in print how to take advantage of the flexible panel layouts and dynamic pages that these books demanded. He was an “all-around man,” writing as well as drawing, even lettering and sometimes coloring his own material. He started out doing screwball filler pages and then graduated to the longer and more lucrative “straight” stuff, though even his most illustrative work happily betrayed his roots in loopy-doodle cartooning. His early straight work was crazily bent: Mantoka (a supernaturally empowered Native American medicine man who takes revenge on evil Caucasians), The Comet (whose disintegrating rays shoot out of his eyes whenever he crosses them to melt down bad guys), and, for Silver Streak Comics, “The Claw (the ultimate Yellow Peril, a fanged Asian warlord who can get taller than King Kong when aroused) all displayed a feverish imagination, verve, and a cheerful streak of perverse violence.

By the end of 1940, Cole had begun working for Quality Comics, Everett (Busy) Arnold’s newly launched line of publications. Quality became home base for the rest of Cole’s comic-book career. The feel and look of the Quality Comics house style had been established by Will Eisner, creator of The Spirit, whose work was to have a major influence on Cole. Eisner, who is now in his eighties and still doing significant comics, had studied painting and hoped to become a theatrical set designer; he was more culturally sophisticated than Cole, who had been shaped mainly by pulps, movies, comic strips, and the other early comic books - which were mostly influenced by more of the same. Cole’s first sustained work for Quality was Midnight, a feature intended by the pragmatic Arnold as a clone of The Spirit - just in case Eisner, who was in the unique position of owning his own character, were to be drafted and die or otherwise leave Quality. Cole learned important lessons in narrative and structural coherence from this apprenticeship, and brought his singular sense of humor and fantasy to the project.

A few months after Midnight came Plastic Man, starting as a minor feature in Police Comics but soon to become the star of that anthology. Inspired by sideshow freaks, Cole planned to call the character the India Rubber Man. Arnold, however, astutely suggested that it might be bouncier to name him after the miracle substance that was reshaping the modern world. In 1943, when Plastic Man expanded into his own book, Cole explained the morphing hero to new readers: “If you should see a man standing on the street and reaching into the top window of a sky-scraper... that’s not astigmatism - it’s Plastic Man!... If you happen upon a gent all bent up like a pretzel... don’t dunk him... it’s Plastic Man! All this and bouncing too, you’ll see when the rubber man and his pal Woozy Winks gamble their lives in - The Game of Death.”


Plastic Man wore a V-necked red rubber leotard accessorized by a wide black-and-yellow striped belt and very cool tinted goggles. He started life as Eel O’Brian, a lowlife gangster accidentally doused by some unnamed acid while committing a robbery. He was saved by a reclusive order of monks who recognized that his villainy was the result of an unhappy childhood. They nursed him back to health and in a memorable couple of panels he discovered his gift.

The acid bath had given him the ability to violate the laws of physics; the monks gave him the will to defend the laws of men, first as part of the police force and later as a special agent for the F.B.I. His F.B.I. chief, sporting one of the most peculiar comb-overs in comics, was the authority figure in Plastic Man’s tiny nuclear family. Nobody knew that Plastic Man and the gangster Eel O’Brian were the same person. His secret identity - as a public enemy he himself was supposed to capture—was too limiting a concept for a hero who could be literally anything he wanted to be. Superman and the tribe that grew from that template have a mere two identities: they’re binary. Plas, as his friends called him, was multiphrenic and illimitable, and soon forgot about being Eel O’Brian.

It says something about Cole’s superego, if not his superhero, that he often cast reformed villains as his principals. Woozy Winks, Plastic Man’s Robin, was hardly a Boy Wonder. He entered the series as a miscreant, the Man Who Can’t Be Harmed, having chosen a life of crime on the basis of a coin toss. Several issues later his powers diminished, so that he became the Man Whom Nature Protects (Sometimes), and he eventually settled in as an all too mortal bungler, a skirt-chaser, and an occasional pickpocket. He was a slovenly, scrotum-cheeked rube in a straw hat and green polka-dot shirt who looked a bit like Alfred Hitchcock. Providing a meatball-shaped counterweight to Plastic Man’s spaghetti, his direct forebear was Popeye’s pal Wimpy. In a more “straight” comic-book reality, Woozy would have provided comic relief.

Naturally enough, Cole resembled both his leads: like Woozy, he was soft-bodied, somewhat dishevelled, and no city slicker; like Plastic Man, he was tall, pointy-nosed, and “very likeable... a straight arrow - sort of a Boy Scout in some ways,” as Gill Fox, Cole’s close friend and his editor at Quality, described him to me.

Cartoonists “become” each character in their comics, acting out every gesture and expression; it’s in this sense that Cole most resembles Plastic Man—as the Spirit of Cartooning. Cole successfully performed the one magic act at the heart of the craft: believing so profoundly in the reality of the world conjured up with lines on paper that, against the odds, the marks gain enough authority to become a real world for the reader. Cole’s world teems with invention, gags, and an amazing number of hyperactive characters tucked into every nook and cranny of a panel. Plastic Man never stretches exactly the same way twice. While Cole’s work is often overloaded with ideas, the drawing is never overwrought; the art displays a Midwesterner’s laconic mastery. What remains most remarkable is his ability to be so fully present in his comic-book work from moment to moment, always following his lines of thought with the same curiosity the reader might have—as astonished as any reader by where they take him.

If the going rate for pictures is still only a thousand words per, most Plastic Man panels are worth at least two or three pictures. Each panel seems to swallow several separate instants of time whole, as if the page were made up of small screens with different, though related, films whizzing by at forty-eight frames a second. Cole’s is an amphetamine-riddled art: Tex Avery on speed! And it’s not just Plastic Man who bounces and twists; any one of Cole’s incidental figures would seem as kinetic as Plastic Man if it were transplanted into someone else’s comic book. Each page is intuitively visualized to form a coherent whole, even though the individual panels form a narrative flood of run-on sentences that breathlessly jump from one page to the next. The art ricochets like a racquetball slammed full force in a closet. Your eye, however, is guided as if it were a skillfully controlled pinball, often by Plastic Man himself acting as a compositional device. His distended body is an arrow pointing out the sights as it hurtles through time. In just a single panel, our hero chases along a footpath in a park, trailing a mugger. Running from the rear of the picture, Plastic Man’s S-curved body echoes the path itself as he loops around one pedestrian in the distance and extends between two lovers about to kiss - lipstick traces are on his elongated neck as he passes them - to swoop up between an old man’s legs like an enormous penis wearing sunglasses and stare into his startled face. Plastic Man had all the crackling intensity of the life force transferred to paper. Pulpier than James Cameron’s Terminator, more frantic than Jim Carrey in The Mask, and less self-conscious than Woody Allen’s Zelig, Plastic Man literally embodied the comic-book form: its exuberant energy, its flexibility, its boyishness, and its only partially sublimated sexuality. Cole’s infinitely malleable hero, Clinton-like in his ability to change shape and squeeze through tiny loopholes, just oozed sex. It was never made explicit - the idea of a hard-core version of Plastic Man boggles the mind - but there was a polymorphously perverse quality to a character who personified Georges Bataille’s notion of the body on the brink of dissolving its borders. Cole let it all hang out as Plastic Man slithered from panel to panel - sometimes shifting from male to female, and freely mutating from erect and hardboiled to soft as a Dali clock.

Most of the plots are as twisted and swervy as Plastic Man himself. They’re convincing enough in their mad, moment-to-moment flow, but they’re as hard to reconstruct and as elusive as dreams, with their vividly improvised incidents. Gender-bending and cross-dressing were the least of it. In a 1942 story, Plastic Man is swallowed whole by one Cyrus Smythe, a seventeenth-century mad doctor whose brain has been transplanted into a dying Army pilot’s body. Smythe, who has learned how to grow hundreds of feet tall, but who must walk on his hands since the body he possesses is paralyzed from the waist down, chokes to death when Plastic Man climbs out of his stomach to lodge himself in the giant’s windpipe. The early stories, while bizarre, don’t feel psychopathic, sadistic, or even particularly mean-spirited in Cole’s telling. In his postwar period, the Plastic Man stories are totally nuts in a different way, prefiguring the idea-per-minute vaudeville zaniness of the early MAD comics. In all his stories, heavily populated by shape-changing villains, mad scientists, and monsters, as well as by more mundane murderers, con men, and saboteurs, Cole demonstrates the termite go-for-broke quality that made his friend Gill Fox exclaim admiringly, “That’s Jack, he’d let his mind go anywhere!”

Gill Fox told me that he remembers starring in an 8-mm. home movie that Cole shot sometime in the early forties, after Jack and Dorothy became his neighbors in Stamford, Connecticut, in order to be closer to Quality’s studio there. Cole’s improvised film scenario, about an ambitious young comic-book artist fighting a deadline, had Fox dragging his drawing table into the bathroom, pulling his pants down, and continuing to work while seated on the toilet. Cole was always behind schedule, a procrastinator and a perfectionist who took pride in his craft and managed to turn out his monthly quota only by working for punishing all-night stretches. Fox recalls a sweltering summer day in the Quality studio that has become legendary among his generation of comic-book artists: Only the nasty buzz of horseflies broke the silence of cartoonists sweating at their desks over some exceptionally brutal deadline when a disturbance broke their concentration. Something was fluttering and streaking by above their heads. All work stopped until they caught what turned out to be one very angry horsefly hauling a long tissue-paper banner with the words “Drink Pepsi Cola!” that Cole had patiently lettered and glued to the insect’s back. A genius at work!

Creig Flessel, an intimate colleague of Cole’s, visited the Quality offices around that time, wanting to observe an old letterer there who could ink in text balloons perfectly without pencilling. He noticed Busy Arnold with large scissors at a near-by desk cutting old Plastic Man originals to ribbons: “I nudged Jack and pointed it out to him, and he just shrugged sheepishly.” After the art was used, Arnold routinely destroyed it to prevent unauthorized reprinting. The disposability of the art was a given, but it makes Cole’s pride in his craft seem downright existential!

The pressure to produce lots of pages quickly, in a situation that offered little prestige and relatively small rates for the skills involved, took its toll. “A number of the artists I knew back then cracked,” says Fox, who still draws a Sunday feature for the Herald Press, in New Britain, Connecticut. “Al Bryant, who drew Doll Man, drove himself into an abutment on the Long Island Expressway shortly after a nervous breakdown. Another guy at Quality, a writer, threw himself in front of a subway, but somehow survived.” John Spranger, an exceptionally gifted artist who assisted on Plastic Man in the postwar years, had a severe breakdown; Bob Wood, like many of the other artists, drank heavily. It was a tough business, making funny books, but Cole flourished in that environment.

At the start of the Second World War, Cole doubled his workload to put money aside for Dorothy in case he got drafted. Although he never had children, and was apparently in good health, he wasn’t taken. As one of the best cartoonists left on the home front at a moment when publishers were selling all the comics their newsprint rations let them print, Cole made out well. He even briefly ghosted the daily newspaper version of The Spirit when Will Eisner got drafted. By the end of the war, Cole was getting the top rate for comic books (about thirty-five dollars per page) as well as occasional bonuses of up to twenty-five hundred dollars when his books broke the two-hundred-thousand point. He and Dorothy bought property and settled into a series of houses in New England. “Their Stamford place was a fourteen-room mansion that had once belonged to the Masked Marvel, a famous pool shark,” Flessel told me. “Dorothy was horrified by the cold marble tiles when she first saw the house, so Jack put in some wall-to-wall carpeting. It must have set him back plenty, but he absolutely doted on his wife.” Flessel remembers Cole with great affection as an acute, thoughtful, and gentle guy, a “pussycat,” with a screwy smile and an irrepressible streak of humor. When I visited the Flessels’ Long Island home, he conjured up one small Jacques Tati-like moment when the Coles were leaving after a weekend visit there in the mid-forties: Stooping to get behind the wheel of his pint-sized car, the oversized Cole knocked his homburg to the ground. He scooped it up while shutting the car door, then casually put the hat back on top of the roof and drove off waving.

Cole worked at home, sending in his popular fifteen-page lead stories for Police Comics every month, as well as material for his Plastic Man solo title and occasional humor pieces for other comics. Fox has said, “Jack insisted on doing everything himself... He didn’t even clear his plot lines with anyone. The only thing we did was copy-read for mistakes.” Cole was elated to get his own book; but when he was told that it would mean having assistants and ghosts do some of the stories he burst into tears. (Neither Flessel nor Fox could verify what might be an apocryphal story, but both independently said it sounded like the Cole they knew.) The problem of Cole’s ghosts and assistants plagues anyone who admires his work. Since some of his assistants - most notably his worshipful friend Alex Kotzky and John Spranger - were very skillful mimics, and since Cole didn’t always sign his own art, the “forgeries” are sometimes as hard to spot as Plastic Man himself in disguise. When the characters tilt and sway, unable to hold themselves upright at a mere ninety degrees, when that extra blaze of invention - a few more ideas than any sane artist would dare squeeze into a panel - shines through, one can surmise that one is in the hands of the master. Plastic Man was totally ghosted after 1950, when Cole reached his giddiest heights before burning out on the character. The ghosts who remained behind lost their inspiration, but the buoyant originality of the basic concept kept Plastic Man afloat through 1956. Subsequent attempts to revive the character haven’t been especially distinguished, nor have imitations that recycle the notion of a stretchable hero, though the character’s virtual DNA lives on in the leader of Marvel Comics’ Fantastic Four, a “straight” Plastic Man with way too much starch.


In 1947, Cole hired Alex Kotzky to help him package True Crime Comics, a new publisher’s short-lived attempt to cash in on the crime comics then dominating the field; a story in the second issue, Murder, Morphine and Me, has become notorious as one of the most intense and delirious examples that the lurid genre had to offer. One small panel - so charged that it has tremor lines around it and tilts, almost tumbling off the page - was enshrined as Exhibit A in Dr. Fredric Wertham’s Seduction of the Innocent, the book that triggered the Senate hearings and thereby toppled the industry: it shows a closeup of Mary Kennedy, the dope-dealing protagonist, being stabbed in the eye by a junkie with a hypodermic needle. I concede that this isn’t Mother Goose, but I find the panel (part of a dream sequence, incidentally) emblematic of the comic book’s visceral power to pass the reader’s analytical defenses and pierce the brain. Dr. Wertham, on the other hand, focussed on the depraved image as an example of “the injury-to-the-eye motif... [that] shows perhaps the true color of crime comics better than anything else. It has no counterpart in any other literature of the world, for children or adults.” I suspect that Dr. Wertham never saw Buñuel and Dali’s “Un Chien Andalou” (the 1929 film shocker that featured a closeup of a woman’s eye getting slashed by a razor), but that it had made a strong impression on Cole. On the other hand, Cole’s True Crime capers point out the continuum between his manic humor and plain old mania. As Kotzky recalled, “Jack was a wild man mentally.”

The New York State Legislature thought enough of Murder, Morphine and Me to reprint eight pages of blowups and excerpts in its 1951 report on comic books and censorship. As a young teen in the arid comic-book landscape of the early sixties, I stumbled onto this report in Manhattan’s Donnell Library. It was my first exposure to Cole, and I checked the report out repeatedly. The story included ethnically stereotyped Scandinavians and Italians, lingerie shots of Mary Kennedy, and more gangland gunplay than there is in a John Woo Hong Kong action flick, all delivered with Cole’s signature velocity. It is also among the most formally sophisticated comics stories I’ve ever seen; all the elements, including the panel shapes and the lettering, are deployed for narrative effect. When Mary, working as a hash-slinger, spills coffee on Tony, seated at her lunch counter, it’s love at first sight. Through two progressive closeups, moving from profiles of their faces to their twitching lips, they exchange a machine-gun volley of speech balloons with dialogue worthy of James M. Cain. Tony departs (“Be seein’ ya, honey eyes”), leaving Mary almost swooning, her heart banging against her chest like a five-hundred-pound canary trying to break out of its cage. (Cole’s body language is priceless.)


Cole’s last comic-book work was for Web of Evil, Quality’s entry into the horror comics of the early fifties. Unlike most of his output, these horror comics, often scripted and barbarically inked by others, look as if they were done for the money. One noteworthy tale, clearly by Cole, The Killer from Saturn, is about a serial murderer from outer space who terrorizes the city but turns out to be a mousy municipal window clerk who has gone postal. Wearing an imposing monster costume and stilts, he takes revenge on those who abused him. He’s put in a mental institution where, in the closing panel, two detectives outside the barred door peer in at the pathetic wimp who still insists that he’s the omnipotent killer from Saturn. One cop says, “He always will be... up here... where he can safely kill... in his imagination.” The story, laced with fifties psychological jargon, seems to be Cole’s hymn to the power of fantasy and the need to keep that power contained.

If Cole was through with comics, comics were also through with him. Searching for work in the fifties, he is said to have brought his portfolio to DC Comics, one of the few publishers that survived past 1954, and was summarily turned away. As early as the mid-forties, he had been preparing to leave the field, more out of ambition and restlessness than remorse. He began to put much of his energy into reshaping himself as a gag cartoonist, selling occasional drawings to the Saturday Evening Post, Collier’s, and Judge. A knack for drawing genuinely sexy women made his cartoons, signed “Jake,” a fixture of the down-market girlie-cartoon and pin-up magazines. Cole was struggling as a mid-echelon gag cartoonist at the end of 1953 when he submitted a batch of gags to Stag Party, a planned men’s magazine that announced its need for cartoons in trade journals. Cole’s drawings began appearing in the fifth issue of the magazine, after it was launched as Playboy. At least one full-page drawing by him appeared in Playboy every month thereafter for the rest of his life.


Hugh Hefner had grown up reading and loving Plastic Man, and, in a phone interview, described it to me as “the most hallucinogenic comic book of its time.” At first, Hefner, a self-confessed failed cartoonist, didn’t realize that he was working with that Jack Cole; indeed, the deft and sophisticated gag cartoons that appeared in Playboy, often in confidently applied, rich watercolor, bore almost no stylistic resemblance to Cole’s brash comic-book art. Hefner remembers receiving the first submission, and though there was nothing he could use in that first batch, he said, “I loved the free and loose line, the quality of even those first pencil roughs, and I wrote a letter strongly encouraging him to send more. One of the things I tried to do was, like The New Yorker, develop a stable of artists closely associated with my magazine.”

Cole soon signed an exclusive contract with Playboy and, in effect, became its defining artist - its Peter Arno. Playboy’s first art editor, Art Paul, told me, “Cole helped give the magazine its visual identity. Unlike Gardner Rea and Eldon Dedini, who came from Esquire, Cole was a Playboy product.” In fact, Females by Cole cocktail napkins were the second product Playboy licensed, right after the cufflinks based on Paul’s famous rabbit logo. The Females, horny derivations of William Steig’s symbolic drawings, were breezy black-and-white brush impressions of women’s psychological states. Cole came up with the concept for the ongoing feature; Hefner, as the very hands-on cartoon editor, worked closely with him.

In 1955, on Hefner’s first trip to New York after launching Playboy, he visited Cole’s home in New Milford. The Coles had just resettled there after floods destroyed their house in Winsted, Connecticut, laying waste to most of their furniture and possessions. Hefner urged Cole to move to the Midwest, and he reluctantly agreed. He wrote to Gill Fox, “Middle of January the boss is moving us to Chicago. Swore I’d never leave these old hills, but he’s dangled so much green bait what’re you going to do? The sad part is leaving old friends.” Though Hefner offered Cole a staff job, he preferred to work at home, and, at the beginning of 1956, settled into what he called that “pool table of a state,” buying a place in the town of Cary, Illinois, about forty miles northwest of Chicago. Hefner was twelve years younger than Cole, and yet, he told me, “My heroes were now working for me - but as Cole’s editor, of course, I was the father figure.”

Hefner points out that Cole was still drawing fantasies for Playboy. Cole’s goddesses were estrogen soufflés who mesmerized the ineffectual saps who lusted after them. The stacked night-club chanteuse who sings “I ain’t got no bodeee...” in one of his oft-reprinted color cartoons makes Marilyn Monroe, whom she’s modelled on, look hardboiled. Cole had climbed to the top of the heap in comic books, even if he looked back on it as a dung heap; now he was the star cartoonist for the hottest and hippest “slick” in America.

In the hierarchy of the applied arts, the comic book has been near the bottom - above only tattoo art and sign painting - and every commercial artist has been as aware of these unspoken aesthetic ranks as any American who isn’t white has been of race. The gag cartoon, being a self-contained, single-image composition and therefore a distant cousin of painting, has been seen as more worthy. The comic strip - because of the fame and great fortune it can bring, and because this is America, where such things have mattered most - has been at the pinnacle. Early in 1958, unbeknownst to Hefner, Cole drew up several weeks’ worth of a newspaper strip called Betsy and Me and walked the samples over to Field Enterprises’ Chicago Sun-Times syndicate after a meeting at Playboy. Cole, like Plastic Man, had changed his appearance: Betsy and Me was drawn in the then ultra-modernistic, minimalist fifties style that looked like nothing he had done before. The complex ongoing “voice-over” narration by nebbish-husband Chester Tibbet about family life with his wife, Betsy, and their five-year-old boy genius, Farley, actually has a formal connection to the inventive narration in Murder, Morphine and Me. The mature verbal sophistication Cole demonstrates in Betsy and Me may be a by-product of the cultivated milieu he encountered through Playboy. The syndicate knew nothing about Cole’s other careers, but found the feature fresh and exciting. The strip was launched that May and was appearing in nearly fifty newspapers by the summer; the forty-three-year-old cartoonist’s childhood ambition for a successful strip of his own was finally being realized. Then Cole snapped.

On Tuesday evening, August 12, 1958, he went to a party at Playboy’s offices. According to Hefner’s private journal, Cole “was seemingly in the best of spirits.” Art Paul told me that Cole, who was habitually temperate, drank a bit more than usual at the gathering, and seemed somewhat overexcited. Cole told him he had something he needed to say - the art editor found this exceptional, since they weren’t intimate, and work-related issues tended to be taken up directly with Hefner - but someone interrupted, and the conversation never took place. The next morning, Cole greeted a neighbor, a railroad conductor he’d known since moving to Cary, who noticed nothing out of the ordinary. At around 2 p.m., Cole told Dorothy he was going out for the mail and the papers. He took their Chevy station wagon, and at around five showed up at Dave Donner’s sport shop, in nearby Crystal Lake. He bought a .22-calibre, single-shot Marlin rifle. Between five-fifteen and five-thirty, he phoned the same neighbor he’d seen earlier and, after apologizing for the imposition, asked him to tell Dorothy that he was going to end it all. Then he hung up. At around 6 p.m., on a gravel road a few miles from his home, three boys found Cole slumped behind the wheel of his car: a bullet wound in his head, the rifle in his lap, and a note on a tablet next to him. He was still alive. At six-ten, a McHenry County Deputy Sheriff, who had been notified of the suicide threat, showed up. The deputy called an ambulance, but Cole died in the hospital at 6:45 p.m. without having regained consciousness. Cole’s note said, “To whom it may concern: Please notify my dear wife, Dorothy Cole, 703 Silver Lake Road, Cary, Illinois, but first tell a neighbor so someone will be with her when she receives the news. Thank you. Jack Cole. Please forgive me, hon.” Cole’s body was carried back to New Castle, and he was buried there on August 16th.

On the day he killed himself, Cole had mailed two letters, which were received the next morning; one was to his wife, the other was to Hugh Hefner. The letter to Hefner reads:

Dear Hef: When you read this I shall be dead. I cannot go on living with myself and hurting those dear to me. What I do has nothing to do with you. You have been the best guy I’ve ever worked for in all these years. I’m only sorry I leave owing you so much, but dear Dorothy will repay you when the estate is settled. I wish you nothing but the best in the years to come. Also my best regards to Pat, Art, Ray, Joe, etc. etc. and all the other fine folks at Playboy. Thanks again for everything, Heffer. You’re a good boy. Kindest regards, Jack

At the inquest, the coroner asked Dorothy about the letter Cole sent to her. She testified that in it he explained why he killed himself. The coroner was able to establish that Cole had never been under a doctor’s care for any nervous condition and then asked Dorothy if she knew of any reason he might have had for taking his life. Dorothy answered only, “We had had an argument before.” When a juror asked if the letter would be entered as evidence, the coroner said, “The letter was a very personal letter. I read it myself. We just wanted to bring it out that far.” After Cole’s death, Dorothy did not maintain contact with her husband’s family or friends. Hefner, too, lost track of her, though he knows that “she remarried about a year or so after.”

Speculating about a suicide’s motives at least keeps a dialogue alive with that conversation-stopper of a corpse. It also drives a thin wooden stake of rational explanation through the corpse’s heart - to punish the dead for their rebuke to the living. The handful of people who care about Cole or his work have speculated as wildly about his suicide as any school class puzzling over E. A. Robinson’s chestnut, “Richard Cory.” Baseless rumors about money problems, terminal illness, substance abuse—more plots than could fill a True Crime comic book—have hovered over Cole’s death. Did he suffer from manic-depression? Cole was never diagnosed, but, like Plastic Man, he had his ups and downs. Dick Cole recalls that as a young man his brother once came home furious after an argument with his fiancée, Dorothy, his hands all bloody from pummelling every tree he’d walked past. Insofar as these things run in families, Cole’s uncle, his father’s brother, Frank, had a breakdown and committed suicide a short time after Jack moved to New York. Cole’s association with Playboy, especially, has fuelled prurient gossip about swinging affairs and infidelities. When I asked Hefner if Cole took part in the Playboy life style, he chuckled: “He was no Shel Silverstein.” If Cole’s last letter to Dorothy had some sordid confession or salacious details, they remain unknown, since the coroner, Theron Ehorn, was no Kenneth Starr. As a result of his discretion, the big question marks that hang over all suicides can’t be dispelled with much more precision than to say that something had gone wrong in the Coles’ twenty-four-year-long marriage, and Jack Cole blamed himself. As Hefner told me, “It’s an unresolved mystery. His end is as inconclusive as a Somerset Maugham story.”

Was Cole “unbalanced”? Of course: it goes with the suicide’s job description. Jacques Rigaut, a Dada artist who shot himself in 1929, once said that “suicide is a vocation”; it’s at least one hell of a career move - look at Sylvia Plath! - and it turns one toward an artist’s work as if to a career résumé. “The mystery of his death informs the work,” as Hefner put it. Suicide does indeed figure in many of Cole’s comic-book stories, like 1948’s Mr. Morbid, wherein a criminal perfumer concocts an essence of misery (one whiff and you knock yourself off), but most of Cole’s cronies used suicide as a plot device without going on to self-destruct. More to the point may be the astonishing number of his Playboy cartoons that have impotence as their subtext. Putting aside limp jokes about Plastic Man’s inability to get it up, impotence - or, rather, the psychologically linked issue of potency as the power to conceive a child - was key to Cole. All who knew Cole told me that he doted on kids. Jack and Dorothy’s childlessness cast a poignant shadow on their isolated lives.

Hefner, who still misses the man and his work, has published several reprint tributes to Cole over the years. One Playboy classic shows a middle-aged milquetoast stretched out on an analyst’s couch. “In the beginning,” he recounts wistfully, “I created the heavens and the earth…” Although Cole looked back on his own beginnings in the comics with disenchantment, dismissing the “comics mags” in a letter to a friend as being “for the birds,” he did have the power to soar and create worlds there, with barely an editor to shackle him.

Plastic Man was a stream of consciousness, allowing Cole’s id the license to ooze freely, and in its bounces and lurches Cole found grace and balance. When he traded in Plastic Man’s silly putty for Playboy’s silicone, he also traded away the innocent and omnidirectional sexuality of infancy for the mere heterosexuality of adolescence. Sublimating further, he squeezed his creativity into ever smaller boxes: his two-dimensional newspaper strip is as sexless as any other nineteen-fifties sitcom. Cole’s heartbreaking “fantasy” about a loving couple doting on their brilliant little boy - it reads like a suicide note delivered in daily installments! As he climbed his ladder of success, up from the primal mulch of the comic books, he finally arrived at air that was too thin to breathe: Jack Cole, a comics genius, died of growing up.

ⓒ Art Spiegelman

14 July 2021

Plastic Man by Jack Cole (No. 32)

Plastic Man (1941-1950)
by Jack Cole

REVIEW BY R. C. HARVEY:
(from The 100 Best Comics of the Century! in The Comics Journal #210, 1999)
In Plastic Man (starting in Police Comics No.1, August 1941) Jack Cole (1918-1958) demonstrated spectacularly how to combine superhero adventures with slapstick comedy to the detriment of neither. It was to prove a unique achievement: no one has successfully revived the feature. 

Written and drawn by Cole, Plastic Man could stretch himself into any shape or to any extremity at will. Extending his legs, he could stride across town in a few steps; he could infiltrate the criminal's lair by contorting into any form. Part of the fun for the reader lay in discovering which of the accoutrements in the crook's hideout was Plas in disguise, lying in wait for his prey. His rubber costume was a dead giveaway, of course: bright red long-sleeved tank suit with a wide yellow-and-black-striped belt. So all you had to do was to find the carpet or door or Oriental vase or easy chair that was red with yellow and black stripes, and, sure enough, the bad guy would get stuck in the carpet or couldn't open the door or flee or be grabbed by the vase or enveloped by the chair while sitting in it, and then Plastic Man would then resume his normal shape and arrest the culprit. 

Cole's device's were both ingenious and humorous, but the chief hilarity of the stories lay in the profusion of sight gags with which Cole infected virtually every page. To add to the fun, the underworld itself seemed populated entirely by fugitives from animated cartoons, but - and this was Cole's great secret - Plastic Man was never a figure of fun or a comedian. Surrounded by burlesque comedy and accompanied by a fat comic sidekick named Woozy Winks, Plas nonetheless took his crime-fighting seriously, and the combination gave the series its distinctive ambiance.


REVIEW BY ART SPIEGELMAN:
(from an article in The New Yorker, 19 April 1999)
If the going rate for pictures is still only a thousand words per, most Plastic Man panels are worth at least two or three pictures. Each panel seems to swallow several separate instants of time whole, as if the page were made up of small screens with different, though related, films whizzing by at forty-eight frames a second. Cole’s is an amphetamine-riddled art: Tex Avery on speed! And it’s not just Plastic Man who bounces and twists; any one of Cole’s incidental figures would seem as kinetic as Plastic Man if it were transplanted into someone else’s comic book. Each page is intuitively visualized to form a coherent whole, even though the individual panels form a narrative flood of run-on sentences that breathlessly jump from one page to the next. The art ricochets like a racquetball slammed full force in a closet. Your eye, however, is guided as if it were a skillfully controlled pinball, often by Plastic Man himself acting as a compositional device. His distended body is an arrow pointing out the sights as it hurtles through time. In just a single panel, our hero chases along a footpath in a park, trailing a mugger. Running from the rear of the picture, Plastic Man’s S-curved body echoes the path itself as he loops around one pedestrian in the distance and extends between two lovers about to kiss - lipstick traces are on his elongated neck as he passes them - to swoop up between an old man’s legs like an enormous penis wearing sunglasses and stare into his startled face. Plastic Man had all the crackling intensity of the life force transferred to paper. Pulpier than James Cameron’s Terminator, more frantic than Jim Carrey in The Mask, and less self-conscious than Woody Allen’s ZeligPlastic Man literally embodied the comic-book form: its exuberant energy, its flexibility, its boyishness, and its only partially sublimated sexuality. Cole’s infinitely malleable hero, Clinton-like in his ability to change shape and squeeze through tiny loopholes, just oozed sex. It was never made explicit - the idea of a hard-core version of Plastic Man boggles the mind - but there was a polymorphously perverse quality to a character who personified Georges Bataille’s notion of the body on the brink of dissolving its borders. Cole let it all hang out as Plastic Man slithered from panel to panel - sometimes shifting from male to female, and freely mutating from erect and hardboiled to soft as a Dali clock. [Read the full article here...]


FURTHER READING:

12 July 2021

The Bungle Family by George Tuthill (No. 99)

The Bungle Family (1924-1945)
by George Tuthill 

REVIEW BY ART SPIEGELMAN:
(from The 100 Best Comics of the Century! in The Comics Journal #210, 1999)
My candidate for Most Underrated Comic Strip in our History: George Tuthill's The Bungle Family, a domestic comedy strip that ran off and on from 1924 to 1945. It was fairly popular in its day but rarely gets a mention in books on the medium and has certainly never been honoured with a U.S. government postage stamp design like Blondie. Tuthill's grubby, uningratiating drawing style and the verbose density of balloon prose hardly make a good first impression; Tuthill's genius was as a writer able to put over one of the darkest visions of American life this side of Nathaniel West. The lower middle-class Bungles, George and Josephine, have no more charm than the style they're drawn in: they are petty, mean-spirited, with no self-awareness, constantly bickering and backbiting among themselves as well as with their neighbours and landlords. Unlike Dagwood and Blondie, one doesn't feel that this is a couple that genuinely cares for each other; they are accidental allies surrounded by hostile figures they detest more than each other. There is no one panel or sequence that can encapsulate this strip's sardonic qualities: Hell is in the details that accumulate in the repeated daily doses that the newspaper comics theatre can provide. Tuthill's misanthropic vision (he's the funny page's Celine) is painfully real, though the strip careened through surreal episodes - especially in its later years - that included visitors from outer space and time travel. visually deadpan, genuinely hilarious once you tune in to its frequency, with a great ear for dialogue and an unsurpassed sense of character, The Bungle Family grows on the reader like a fungus until, like all great art, it becomes a central reference point in one's way of understanding the world.


REVIEW BY DAN NADEL:
(from TCJ.com, 2014)
The Bungle Family deserves an audience - it is perhaps the most contemporary of the classic comic strips, with timing and dialogue situations that are oddly current in today's comedy culture. It's a great and funny and nasty and, in its way, beautiful piece of work.


REVIEW BY BILL BLACKBEARD:
As a work of narrative comic art, The Bungle Family effectively went unseen over its quarter-century span except on the daily and Sunday comic pages of American newspapers, with no shelvable record or cinematic adaptation of any kind. Yet the strip appeared in hundreds of papers with virtually no drops from its early years through the '40s, when Tuthill closed it down to almost universal protests from readers and editors, yielding to their entreaties once for a revival run of a few years, then retiring it firmly in 1945 for good. (For two more decades, Tuthill lived quietly as the wealthy squire of tiny Ferguson, Mo., relishing his days away from drawing-board demands, never knowing the attention that still unborn comic-strip fandom would have brought him from the ’60s on—and perhaps not caring.)


FURTHER READING:


28 June 2021

Harvey Kurtzman's Jungle Book by Harvey Kurtzman (No. 26)

Harvey Kurtzman's Jungle Book (1959)
by Harvey Kurtzman 

REVIEW BY KIM THOMPSON:
(from The 100 Best Comics of the Century! in The Comics Journal #210, 1999)
In the four decades between 1952, when he drew his last Frontline Combat story, and his death in 1993, Harvey Kurtzman produced only one substantial narrative piece of work as an illustrator: Harvey Kurtzman's Jungle Book.

Coming off the cancellation of the Playboy-backed Trump and subsequent failure of the self-published Humbug, Kurtzman picked up his drawing tools again at the request of publisher Ian Ballantine, who hoped to duplicate the success of the Mad paperbacks with original paperback cartoon books.

Kurtzman's concept was a quatrain of extended satirical strips: "Thelonius Violence", a Peter Gunn parody narrated in bebop jive, complete with musical soundtrack effects; "Organisation Man in the Grey Flannel Executive Suite", a sardonic look at the corporate world, in which Kurtzman got in his digs at the magazine industry; "Compulsion on the Range", a witty fusion of in-vogue Freudian pop psychology into the TV series Gunsmoke; and "Decadence Degenerated", a funny but deeply serious story of a small-town lynching, build around Kurtzman'z own appalled recollections of a stay in the Deep South.

At 140 brilliant pages, the Jungle Book is certainly Kurtzman's most substantial graphic achievement. The vigour and immediacy of the brushwork, the bold use of tones, the hypnotic pattern of sustained and broken visual rhythms from panel to panel and page to page, make it one of the most formally inventive comic books ever published. And Kurtzman's mordant wit, freed from the constraints of shorter magazine pieces, would never again display as pitiless a bite.

That last Frontline Combat story, a meditation on fate, was called "The Big If". Harvey Kurtzman's Jungle Book provides the biggest "if" in comics history: What if it had been a success? What if Kurtzman instead of being forced to leapfrog from more failed anthologies to the compromised Little Annie Fanny to teaching and illustration jobs, had been able to recreate himself as a one-man satirical storyteller - writing and drawing for magazines and books? What if he had succeeded in caving a niche in the mainstream publishing world, into which the whole next generation of cartoonists could have poured - short story writers, essayists, and novelists who just happened to work in the comics form?

Harvey Kurtzman's Jungle Book remains one of the art form's most stunning successes, and one of the fields most heartbreaking failures.


REVIEW BY ART SPIEGELMAN:
Like most of the other copies of Jungle Book I’ve seen, mine is like a murkily printed newsprint portfolio. The glue binding is just a memory. I keep all the loose yellowed pages in a plastic bag. I’ve handled these pages with all the care due a sacred text, but it just won’t hold up under many more re-readings...  Nowhere else is there such a large body of Kurtzman’s drawings, and Jungle Book was an important step toward making comics Adult Entertainment.


REVIEW BY ROBERT CRUMB:
He is as good as any cartoonist in history that I know of. Some of his greatest stuff was done in a little Ballantine Book called Harvey Kurtzman's Jungle Book published around 1959. Kurtzman did all the drawing as well as the writing. I hope somebody will reprint it someday in its entirety on good paper, as I'd like to own a copy.


FURTHER READING:



26 June 2021

Ballbuster: Bernard Krigstein's Life Between The Panels

Bernard Krigstein
Portrait by Drew Friedman

ART SPIEGELMAN:
(from The New Yorker, 22 July 2002)
The current "Spider-Man" movie will sell more Spider-Man toothbrushes, action figures, and frosted Spidey-berry-filled Pop-Tarts in its wake than actual Spider-man comic books: comics are simply not the popular form of popular culture that they were in their mid-twentieth-century heyday, though what the bastard form has lost in popularity it has been gaining in legitimacy. Barely an eyebrow now raises when cartoonists receive serious academic and critical attention, museum exhibitions, MacArthur grants, and Guggenheim fellowships.

Anyone interested in crossing the ever-narrowing divide between High and Low culture ought to contemplate the work and troubled career of Bernard Krigstein (1919-90), a postwar comic-book illustrator who had the privilege and the misfortune of being an Artist with a capital "A" working in an Art Form that considered itself only a Business. Krigstein was never associated with a specific character (the most sure ticket to comics success), and he never wrote his own stories (a handicap in a narrative medium). He wasn't beloved by publishers, editors, or readers. What reputation he has rests on a handful of short stories he illustrated in 1954 and 1955 for EC comics (the folks who brought you Tales from the Crypt and Mad), but one of those stories, Master Race, was an accomplishment of the highest order - a masterpiece.

All eight pages of Master Race are exquisitely reproduced in Greg Sadowski's new coffee-table biography, "B. Krigstein" (Fantagraphics; $49.95), as are a few other key stories and some sample pages, but the entire project is as quixotic as the career it describes. Ominously subtitled "Volume One (1919-1955)", the book offers a profusion of the artist's juvenilia, paintings (including student copies of Renaissance works in the Met), minor illustrations, sheaves of wartime sketches, and letters to his wife, Natalie (who wrote the foreword), and even a reproduction of his college transcripts. This detailed sifting of the remains wouldn't seem like folly if the subject were, say, Jackson Pollock or some other fabled hero anointed by the Gods of Art History. The book is probably the one Bernard Krigstein would have wished for himself, but it is not the book he needs: a well-selected anthology culled from the couple of hundred comic-book stories he illustrated, mostly in the nineteen-forties and fifties. As it stands, the current book is best read as a poignant bildungsroman about a disappeared type: the mid-century lower-middle-class New York Jewish intellectual, drunk on art and culture, struggling to survive morally and aesthetically in the commercial wilderness.

"The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay," Michael Chabon's 2000 novel, reminds us that the early comic-book industry was a specifically Jewish milieu, virtually an extension of the rag trade. It was invented by a Jewish printing salesman and popularized with stories created by two Jewish kids from Cleveland about an immigrant from the planet Krypton. Many of the first generation of creators - like Will Eisner, Bob Kane (Kahn), Stan Lee (Lieber), and Jack Kirby (Kurtzberg) - were first- and second-generation New York Jews. And, while many of them were intelligent, very few were educated, and only Krigstein was a true intellectual. He would have had more in common with the staff of Partisan Review or Commentary than he did with his colleagues on Nyoka the Jungle Girl, Space Patrol, and Strange Tales of the Unusual.

Krigstein first heard what he later called "the sound of art" in junior high school. He opened a book on art appreciation and got bitten by one of Cézanne's apples. At Brooklyn College, his future wife persuaded him to switch his major from accounting and commit himself to becoming a "fine" artist. Economic need made Krigstein, like many other aspiring painters, stumble into comic-book work. Unlike the others, he began to sense the form's potential and, without condescension, put all his skill and insight into testing its limits. His paintings looked back to representational values that were at least fifty years out of date; his comics were visionary and looked ahead at least that far.

After he abandoned the field, in the nineteen-sixties (and was abandoned by it), he said, "I found that comics was drawing and... shed all criticism of the form as I worked in it." Usually hampered by banal scripts, Krigstein reflected:

My futile idea was that action in comics, as in any art, doesn't end with one person pounding another person in the jaw. There's also the action of emotion, psychology, character and idea. I yearned to have stories which dealt with more reality and people's feelings and thoughts... a kind of literary form, let's say even a Chekhovian form, where one could delve into real people and real feelings.

Manny Stallman, a more typical comic-book artist, once turned to Krigstein's brother in disbelief and said, "Bernie's actually taking this stuff seriously!"

Commercial art, for all its constraints, seemed like the only haven for figurative artists at mid-century, and Krigstein took a craftsman's pride in his accurate perspectives and his researched images based on observation. Without looking cramped, his well-balanced panels began to teem with crowds of individually articulated figures. He disdained shortcuts and easy solutions, and replaced the cartoonist's vocabulary of sweat marks and action lines with a painter's language of composition and form. It's as if the other cartoonists were expressively drawing Yiddish while Krigstein eloquently drew Hebrew.

Combative by nature, he fought the indifference and deadlines of the assembly-line shops for the right to ink his own panels. Astoundingly, at the zenith of the McCarthy era he led a battle to unionize freelance comic-book artists so they would all receive standardized rates, health benefits, and a modicum of respect. After his organizing efforts crumbled, in 1953, Krigstein had the good fortune to hook up with EC comics. The scripts were notches above the rest, and the outfit sought the best illustrators, encouraging them to develop individual approaches.

Nearing the height of his powers, Krigstein adjusted his style for each of the EC stories he was assigned: stately calligraphic panels influenced by Eastern art for adapting a Ray Bradbury fable set in ancient China; a scratchy German Expressionist approach for a story about an evil hypnotist seen from the murderer's point of view; crisp fifties modernism for the tale of a murderously curdled suburban marriage. All displayed Krigstein's cool intelligence and mastery. All were elegant - even beautiful - though somehow uningratiating. Highly respected by his EC peers, Krigstein was not a favorite with EC readers, who preferred Wally Wood's obsessively detailed rocket ships and Graham Ingels' fetid corpses.

Krigstein began to vibrate with the inner language of comics, to understand that its essence lay in the "breakdowns," the box-to-box exposition that breaks moments of time down into spatial units. "It's what happens between these panels that's so fascinating," he said in a 1962 interview. "Look at all that dramatic action that one never gets a chance to see. It's between these panels that the fascinating stuff takes place. And unless the artist would be permitted to delve into that, the form must remain infantile."

Krigstein became ravenous for more panels than the rigidly formatted short scripts permitted; he took to subdividing the pre-lettered art boards to allow more and more—albeit smaller and narrower—boxes on his pages. Then Al Feldstein, EC's primary editor and scriptwriter, assigned him a six-page story, "Master Race." A memory-haunted concentration-camp refugee, Carl Reissman, enters a subway car and recognizes the cadaverous stranger who sits across from him. A flashback details the horrors of the Third Reich and finally reveals that Reissman had been a perpetrator - the commandant of a death camp. The stranger chases him down an empty platform, where Reissman slips and is crushed by an onrushing train. Whether the mysterious stranger was a former victim who once swore revenge or a projection of Reissman's guilt is left unresolved.

Feldstein thought of this as one more "snap-ending" story patterned after O. Henry, much like the three others he cranked out each week. It just so happened that this one was about the Nazi death camps and postwar guilt at a time when the culture was unwilling to reckon with the catastrophe in any medium. Krigstein seized on the script as a chance to demonstrate his own and the medium's possibilities. He begged for twelve pages and was begrudgingly granted eight.

Krigstein's formal qualities as a storyteller—not the story's subject matter - make Master Race a tour de force. He encapsulates the decade of Nazi terror powerfully but with restraint, never slipping into the Grand Guignol that made EC notorious. The two tiers of wordless staccato panels that climax the story have become justly famous among the comics literate. They have often been described as "cinematic," a phrase thoroughly inadequate to the achievement: Krigstein condenses and distends time itself. The short chase that ends Reissman's life takes up about the same number of panels given over to the entire Hitler decade; Reissman's life floats in space like the suspended matter in a lava lamp. The cumulative effect carries an impact - simultaneously visceral and intellectual - that is unique to comics.

Hardly anyone noticed the story, published in Tales Designed to Carry an IMPACT #1. It was barely distributed, lost in the aftermath of the devastating 1954 Senate investigation into the relationship between reading comic books and juvenile delinquency. As EC and the rest of the comics industry evaporated around him, Krigstein briefly went to work in his father's dress factory. After several months of filial squabbles, he turned to freelance magazine, book, and record-jacket illustration, where his integrity and his contentiousness eventually limited his success. He vainly tried to interest book publishers in a massive comics adaptation of "War and Peace," but by 1962 had settled into a twenty-year career teaching illustration at New York's High School of Art and Design, to subsidize his devotion to painting.

I was a cartooning major at Art and Design in 1963. Only vaguely aware of Krigstein's comics, I gave him a wide berth. He was a small, barrel-chested man with a reputation among my illustration-major friends as a tough teacher, humorless and completely dismissive of comics. I was delighted to learn from Sadowski's book that the initials Krigstein used when signing his early superhero pages, "B. B. Krig," stood for the nickname he had earned in the Army: Ballbuster.

I met him only once, in the early seventies. John Benson, the editor of an EC fanzine called Squa Tront, wanted to expand and publish a panel-by-panel analysis of Master Race that I had written in 1967 as a college term paper. We went to visit Krigstein at his painting studio, on East Twenty-third Street, so I could read it to him and get his responses. Krigstein at first demurred that those days were long behind him and he didn't remember much about the work. As I began reading, he entered into the analysis avidly, acknowledging a reference to Futurism in one panel, to Mondrian in another, denying a reference to George Grosz in yet another. He basked when I pointed to a visual onomatopoeia that conjured up a subway's rumble. It was as if messages he'd sent off in bottles decades earlier had finally been found.

At the end of the paper, I had compared his approach to that of some important contemporaries whom I also admired, including Harvey Kurtzman and Will Eisner. When I read that paragraph, Krigstein darkened. "Eisner!" he shouted. "Eisner is the enemy! When you are with me, I am the only artist!" He yanked me further into his studio and pointed at the walls. "Look!" he roared. "You see these paintings?" I saw several large, molten, and lumpy Post-Impressionist landscapes in acidic colors. "These are my panels now!" His voice betrayed all the anguish of a brokenhearted lover.

© Art Spiegelman

25 June 2021

Master Race by Bernard Krigstein & Al Feldstein (No. 76)

Master Race (1955)
by Bernard Krigstein & Al Feldstein
(Impact #1 cover art by Jack Davis)

REVIEW BY TOM SPURGEON:
(from The 100 Best Comics of the Century! in The Comics Journal #210, 1999)
Master Race is one of the justifiably exalted comics of the 20th Century, and a stunning showcase of comics storytelling for artist Bernard Krigstein. Intended for an issue of Shock SuspenStories, Master Race appeared in the first issue of the New Direction EC title Impact, and remains its most memorable story.

The script, credited to the underrated Al Feldstein, tells the story of a chance meeting between a former concentration camp commandant and a camp survivor on a New York subway. The encounter ends with the former Nazi's death. As a straight piece of drama, Master Race is a solid, capable work of fiction. Feldstein's script is professionally forceful and provocative, while Krigstein's illustrations serve the story's dramatic highlights perfectly: the depictions of both the chase and the commandants crimes are magnificently expressive without veering into melodrama.

However, Master Race is best remembered for Krigstein's exploration of the possibilities of narrative in comics form. Expanding the script from six to eight pages, Krigstein opened up the story's graphic possibilities. His solutions to various storytelling problems are incredibly sophisticated: radical shifts in perspective between the pursuer and the pursued; building mood through panel size and text placement; switching from objective to subjective viewpoints; and showing dramatic highs by slowing down the action across a series of panels. The panels where Krigstein shows the passing of the subway cars through repeating images within the same panel are so astonishing, so adept, and so perfect they serve as arguments in and of themselves that Master Race is a rare artistic achievement by one of comics greatest forward thinkers.

Master Race is also one of the most studied comics of all time, most notably in the seminal piece of comics criticism "An Examination of Master Race" (by John Benson and David Kasakove, working in part from an Art Spiegelman essay and close reading of the story). A perfect marriage of artist, approach, and subject matter, Master Race rewards the constant reconsideration it richly deserves.


REVIEW BY NEIL GAIMAN:
One of the most important stories in the history of comics and the history of the art of comics...


REVIEW BY ART SPIEGELMAN:
...I was a cartooning major at Art and Design in 1963. Only vaguely aware of Krigstein's comics, I gave him a wide berth. He was a small, barrel-chested man with a reputation among my illustration-major friends as a tough teacher, humorless and completely dismissive of comics. I was delighted to learn from Sadowski's book that the initials Krigstein used when signing his early superhero pages, "B. B. Krig," stood for the nickname he had earned in the Army: Ballbuster.

I met him only once, in the early seventies. John Benson, the editor of an EC fanzine called Squa Tront, wanted to expand and publish a panel-by-panel analysis of "Master Race" that I had written in 1967 as a college term paper. We went to visit Krigstein at his painting studio, on East Twenty-third Street, so I could read it to him and get his responses. Krigstein at first demurred that those days were long behind him and he didn't remember much about the work. As I began reading, he entered into the analysis avidly, acknowledging a reference to Futurism in one panel, to Mondrian in another, denying a reference to George Grosz in yet another. He basked when I pointed to a visual onomatopoeia that conjured up a subway's rumble. It was as if messages he'd sent off in bottles decades earlier had finally been found.

At the end of the paper, I had compared his approach to that of some important contemporaries whom I also admired, including Harvey Kurtzman and Will Eisner. When I read that paragraph, Krigstein darkened. "Eisner!" he shouted. "Eisner is the enemy! When you are with me, I am the only artist!" He yanked me further into his studio and pointed at the walls. "Look!" he roared. "You see these paintings?" I saw several large, molten, and lumpy Post-Impressionist landscapes in acidic colors. "These are my panels now!" His voice betrayed all the anguish of a brokenhearted lover.


REVIEW BY DAVE SIM:
All they have to do is give him his own book, as they did with Kurtzman, and comic books could have jumped three or four decades in maturity inside of a year. No go. In fact, just the opposite happens. They start cutting the page count. To me it was an object lesson in the fact that innovation and business interests, while completely compatible are seen by businessmen as completely incompatible... If in later years, long after I'm dead, someone sees something in my work that seems - to them - as innovative as Master Race seemed - and seems - to me... Well, I'm pretty sure they will also see that what I achieved was only possible through self-publishing and, hopefully, I will have saved a handful of future creators from hitting a brick wall at their innovative peak that Feldstein and Gaines forced Krigstein to hit at his own creative high point.


FURTHER READING:



Master Race
Impact #1, EC Comics, 1955
Original art by Bernard Krigstein